Why not try the tree-behind approach on the left side, where there's
more room for extra tree-weight?


On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:33:22 -0500, Jerry Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony, I think I agree with your client.
> 
> Not that #1 is not better looking/more attractive.
> 
> But the emphasis is on the tree not the state in #1, and vice versa in #3
> 
> Since the company name is MarylandReserve, and not TreesinMaryland, I like 
> the reversed emphasis even though it ain't as pretty.
> 
> The logo is right-heavy and looks like it will tip over at any moment, but it 
> really let's the state shape stand out (which is lost a little in #1).
> 
> FWIW
> 
> Jerry Johnson
> Web Developer
> Dolan Media Company
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:150442
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to