fox news isn't biased? What strange bedfellows this case has made. I need to do some stuff but I'll have a look at these in a bit. Meanwhile, I notice that Michael Sciavo plans to have Terri cremated. It's just coincidence of course.
Dana On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:36:36 -0500, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also forgot to mention that there's been some interesting facts on fox > news's presentation of these CNA's and affidavits: > > http://mediamatters.org/items/200503230001 > > Judge Greer also had an interesting take on the issue: > The remaining affidavits deal exclusively with events which > allegedly occurred in the 1995-1997 time frame. The court feels > constrained to discuss them. They are incredible to say the least. Ms. > Iyer details what amounts to a 15-month cover-up which would include > the staff of Palm Garden of Lago Convalescent Center, the Guardian of > the Person, the Guardian ad Litem, the medical professionals, the > police and, believe it or not, Mr. and Mrs. Schindler. Her affidavit > clearly states that she would "call them (Mr. and Mrs. Schindler) > anyway because I thought they should know about their daughter." The > affidavit of Ms. Law speaks of Terri responding on a constant basis. > Neither in the testimony nor in the medical records is there support > for these affidavits as they purport to detail activities and > responses of Terri Schiavo. It is impossible to believe that Mr. and > Mrs. Schindler would not have subpoenaed Ms. Iyer for the January 2000 > evidentiary hearing had she contacted them as her affidavit alleges. > > from http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0903.pdf > > larry > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:21:24 -0500, Larry C. Lyons > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's the actual link http://www.sweetliberty.org/bulletins/terri/aff.htm > > > > I was responding directly to one person's comments from a couple of > > days ago. As usual it was from a biased source that did not include > > all the information. > > > > larry > > > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:42:08 -0600, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > link? > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:49:58 -0500, Larry C. Lyons > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I finally got around to reading the three afidavits of the CNA's > > > > (certified nursing assistants) that those in favour of letting Ms > > > > Shiavo's remains live insisted proved otherwise, here's my take on > > > > them: > > > > After reading these affidavits I think it safe to say that the internal > > > > inconsistencies render unacceptable to any unbiased judge. > > > > > > > > Heidi Law reports that she worked evenings and overnight shifts for > > > > only a few months but reports about how Terri was handled after lunch. > > > > Since this doesn't correspond to her earlier statements that she > > > > worked only in the hours between 3 PM and 7 AM. Coupled with the > > > > extremely short period of time she reports she was in contact with > > > > Terri Schiavo this affidavit would be rejected as of no value. > > > > > > > > Carolyn Johnson is clearly lying. She claims to have asked why Terri > > > > Schiavo wasn't sitting in a chair with a cup and straw available. > > > > Since Mrs. Schiavo cannot swallow and must be fed and hydrated through > > > > a tube inserted into her stomach her claim is pretty clearly false. > > > > > > > > Carla Iyer is making claims unsupported by any other evidence and in > > > > direct contradiction with those of various examining physicians from > > > > the same period. Further CT scans from 1998 show that Mrs. Schiavo's > > > > cerebral cortex was almost completely withered and that C-S fluid has > > > > filled in the volume previously filled with gray matter. Without the > > > > tissue which was no longer present speech is not possible. Her claims > > > > that her notes on Mrs. Schiavo's chart were removed are unbelievable. > > > > Notes are entered in ball point and deleting them would result in > > > > either obvious markings or require new pages on the chart which would > > > > not be signed by the nurse on duty which is standard practice. This > > > > would be easy to check and I'm confident that examination would > > > > indicate no irregularities as Iyer's complaint seems to be a classic > > > > disgruntled ex-employee statement. This is the only one of the three > > > > that merits even the least investigation. Since it was possible to > > > > find that this affidavit was submitted to the court 18 months ago and > > > > was part of at least 2 different hearings I must conclude that no > > > > corroborating evidence exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151740 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
