<g> of course ...

Dana

On 4/18/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I said there is no reliable inventory for abusers. or at least one you
> have put forward.
> 
> As for respect, well frankly my dear I don't give a rat's ass. You've
> already shown what you are. and are appropriately killfiled.
> 
> On 4/18/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whereas I think we should be very careful before we decide that
> > someone would be better off dead. Bottom line, is she better off dead
> > or is it just better for *him*?
> >
> > So when we are talking about a possibility like that and it is being
> > dismissed as unimportant I find it a little difficult to be
> > overconcerned about maligning somoene who runs around saying his
> > wife's brain is a bag of water.
> >
> > I don't have much respect for Larry's posts any more. You may have
> > noticed that I didn't bother asking him for a citation for his
> > assertion that there is no inventory for an abusive relationship,
> > because there is no such citation -- I speak as one who has been
> > through scholar.google.com pretty thoroughly -- and he won't bother to
> > answer because he can't and he never admits it when he is wrong.
> >
> > Look. There is a profile. Whether you choose to believe ot like it or
> > not. The assertion that there isn't is simply laughable. If you want
> > to see the numbers that go with it, read the studies I posted. If you
> > don't want to, quit complaining that the profile doesn't tell you that
> > there is a 51.25 percent chance that you are in an abusive
> > relationship. As in most things, reality is slightly different and
> > more complex. Some people have risk factors and overcome them. Some
> > people get help. Some people engage in denial and go there ::shrug::
> >
> > Let's focus on what is important, you and I. The only reason this even
> > matters is that it goes to Michael Schiavo's credibilty as
> > spokesperson for Terri. It is possible for him to be both abusive and
> > truthful, sure. But a doubt would arise.
> >
> > Now, some of saying that he fits the profile assumes that certain
> > statements made by other people are accurate, sure.
> >
> > But let me see if I can get it all in one post without forgetting
> > anything. After that, if you would like to believe that there is no
> > such thing as domestic abuse, that Michael Schiavo is a great guy and
> > the Schindlers are neurotic fools, hey my friend, whatever floats your
> > boat. I have only persisted this long because you have struck me up to
> > this point as someone who gives osme thought to things.
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > a) What seems to be uncontested is that neither one of this couple had
> > much education and that neither had a terribly exciting job. There
> > were issues with money. All of this is typical of the background to
> > abuse but does not prove it existed.
> >
> > b) Where we start to fit a little more closely is that he chose a
> > woman who was younger and overweight, who was shy and did not have a
> > lot of self-confidence. She married the first guy she ever kissed. At
> > 20. This proves nothing in and of itself but is somewhat suggestive in
> > conjunction with a).
> >
> > c) This man is prone to rages when things are not to his liking.
> > Remember "nursing hime administrator's nightmare"?
> >
> > d) His wife lost weight, became more attractive and more outspoken,
> > and the marriage ran into difficulties. Could be coincidence but is
> > very classic especially against a background of a and b.
> >
> > e) She wound up in the hospital on the eve of leaving him. Does assume
> > that the woman saying this was telling the truth, but is almost
> > diagnostic if true. Men with power issues can't stand to be left.
> >
> > From here down we assume that certain people are telling the truth.
> > The fit with the profile depends on whether they are in fact telling
> > the truth of course.
> >
> > And there are things we will never know, such as whether he hit her,
> > but there *are* those unexplained injuries, which a radiologist said
> > in one of the links that I posted would be *required* to be reported
> > if seen in a child. I have not seen a better explanation than his.
> >
> > One of Terri's family -- I believe it was the sister -- said that
> > Michael attacked her the night Terri went to the hospital.
> >
> > According to the shrink who made the much-aligned original statement
> > that he fit the profile, he used to check her odometer to make sure
> > she wasn't going anywhere without his permission. Also very suggestive
> > of advanced power issues.
> >
> > According to Cindy Shook, an ex-girlfriend who may of course have her
> > own agenda, he used to stalk her.
> >
> > Also according to Cindy Shook, he was extremely jealous.
> >
> > Cindy Shook also said she was terrified of him and she did not come
> > forward until she was supoenaed because she was convinced he would
> > hurt her child.
> >
> > Cindy Shook investigated getting a restraining order.
> >
> > Cindy Shook said said that Shiavo blames Terri for ruining his life
> > and felt he was entitled to compensation (she was his girlfriend at
> > the time of the malpractice trial). She also said that he told her
> > they never discussed last wishes.
> >
> > I don't remember the name of the nurse, but there were affidavits to
> > the effect that Schiavo would call up and ask when the bitch was going
> > to die.
> >
> > I still see no good reason for not allowing the blinds to be opened.
> >
> > There are concerns from this period that would amount to neglect if
> > true, the wheelchair not being repaired, Terri not being allowed out
> > of bed, infections, etc. I don't know if these are among the
> > allegations that were dismissed as unfounded.
> >
> > Using her money would also qualify as abuse.
> >
> > Let's see, intimidatng, yes, a lot of people seem to decribe him that
> > way and I think some of the staff used the word abusive in their
> > affidavits; also, if true, he was very concerned about minor details
> > of her daily regimen like making sure her hands weren't bandaged.
> >
> > Let's see, withholding food water or medical treatment, trifecta there....
> >
> > Abusing pets, hmm, he had her cats put to sleep...
> >
> > Minimizing the abuse, saying the abuse never happened, ayup...shifting
> > responsibility, yes, see above...
> >
> > Preventing the spouse from seeing family, isolating, yes....
> >
> > Mock you or humiliate you, depends on whether you count being compared
> > to a table lamp....
> >
> > :P
> >
> > I'm done with this topic.
> >
> > Dana
> >
> > On 4/17/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Dana wrote:
> > > > So. We are left with the fact that my opinion hasn't changed, and
> > > > neither has yours :) I am glad that you don't have any stake in my
> > >
> > > I'm challenging you because you said, "he fits the profile."  Based on
> > > your responses, what you meant was that he met your subjective opinion
> > > and not a objective probabilistic profile.
> > >
> > > The problem I have with that is in saying "he fits the profile" you
> > > imply that you have some expertise in such matters and are making an
> > > objective statement rather than an opinion - that's a lie of omission;
> > > maybe in your case it's due to exuberance, I dunno.
> > >
> > > If Larry's post if accurate, my suspicion is is right: there's a bunch
> > > of people that can't understand someone who's fighting for another's
> > > decision they wouldn't make so they try to make sense of it by
> > > inventing things to fit their fantasy rather than accepting what they
> > > see.
> > >
> > > The problem with that is that they're messing with someone's life and
> > > I think we should be very careful before we go doing that.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154342
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to