That type of layout is easily accomplished with a simple table. An all-div 
solution is just a pain in the neck.

It's always useful to remember that there's absolutely NOTHING wrong with using 
a table as a layout grid. It validates, is accessible and renders fine in all 
browsers.



> I have our new CSS based prototype [1] looking like our 
> designer/marketing/branding specifications, as represented in our 
> current website [2]; but only in Firefox.  I already know I have a 
> serious problem in IE 5.5 and 6 that I am trying to figure out.  
> Advice would be gratefully accepted.  I would also appreciate 
> critiques of the prototype as it appears in other browsers.  Does it 
> degrade well?  If not, can I improve my mark-up and/or styles to allow 
> it to work and degrade better in other browsers?
> 
> Visually I think it is on the money; except for the need of a new 
> background image for the main menu to replace my crude cut job from 
> the original graphic buttons.  Otherwise the only problem visually is 
> strange, intermittent spacing gaps in the main menu.  If anybody can 
> advise me on how to fix these I would be most thankful.  I believe it 
> is rounding problems, because the errors change locations and appear 
> and disappear as I scale my browser window in and out.  
> 
> Semantically is another story.  To get the curved corners found in the 
> original [2], I had to use a lot of contextually valueless images.  I 
> am not very satisfied with this, so I'm looking for any viable 
> alternatives.  By using the images I was able to get the curved 
> corners to scale with the font size.  I like this feature, but I'm not 
> sure I like it enough to keep all these unnecessary <img> tags.  I'm 
> currently of two thoughts.  One is to use JavaScript to dynamically 
> add the <img> tags.  At least then they are not there unless JS runs.  
> Or, I'm thinking of placing the graphics into background-image styles, 
> but then they will no longer scale.  This is probably not too bad for 
> larger font size since I will still have round rectangles, but for 
> smaller font sizes, I get funky bullet shapes that are considerable 
> less desirable. 
> 
> Speaking of font sizes; they are currently all px's taken directly 
> from the present version [2].  I have a great deal of difficulty 
> figuring out relative font sizes, and where to place them in my style 
> sheets to avoid and/or properly exploit cascade multiplication.  This 
> would be another place I could use some help to set up my font-sizes 
> to initially approximate the sizes of the current version [2], but be 
> scalable by the user even in IE.
> 
> Thank You
> 
> [1] http://www.bloodsource.org/bugtests/bs_title_test.cfm
> [2] http://www.bloodsource.org/AboutUs/JobsCareers.cfm
> 
> 
> --------------
> Ian Skinner
> Web Programmer
> BloodSource
> www.BloodSource.org
> Sacramento, CA
 
> 
> "C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!"
> - Cynthia Dunning
> 
> Confidentiality Notice:  This message including any
> attachments is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender and
> delete any copies of this message. 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154851
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to