Actually I think it's National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management land. Which would make it sort of grey area, as they often lease their land to ranchers and the like. But no, it's not directly applicable from this ruling... but considering that a call for a building moratorium on that side of town is already being called irresponsible I don't see it as too much of a stretch. Developers good. Open space bad. Any questions?
By the way, they're already building a limited-access freeway through it, and tribal rights be damned. Dana On 6/24/05, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ya... the first thing that leapt to my mind was the west side of > > albuquerque where the only open space hat's left is sacred tribal land > > with is also, incidentally, historically important in that it has been > > used for this purpose for a thousand years... > > I think that would be protected since tribal lands are considered a > part of the tribe; that makes the land a soverign holding of the tribe > and not under the jurisdiction of the state or federal bodies. > > Hatton > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:162124 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
