erm, lack of three-toed beasties of that size on modern-day Mount McKinley? And yes, I imagine they coud date the rock.
Dana On 7/6/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, can they be *certain*? I believe it is a dino, personally, but I > like to argue the religious wacko side sometimes. :) > > William Bowen wrote: > > erm... precedent? > > > > > > experience. > > > > there are clues, it's not like they're randomly proclaiming certain > > things to be fossils or fossilized (though yes, this has happened, it > > isn't common). > > > > approximate age of the rock itself. type of track, talon/toe placement, etc. > > > > > > > >>To play devil's advocate here, how does one jump to the conclusion that > >>it is a dinosaur footprint? > > > > > > > > -- > ================================================================= > Ray Champagne - Senior Application Developer > CrystalVision Web Site Design and Internet Services > 603.433.9559 > www.crystalvision.org > ================================================================= > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:163140 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
