first of all. you would totally dig the weeg man. nice guy.
completely and utterly straight to the point of sickeness and
certainly approves of sex only relationships (enjoyed the fuck
out of them during my Before-Jayme years :) but with that outta
the way, not trying to defend myself, but if i had more time, id write
posts just like jim's ( i just dont have the time :)
he is a nice guy, REALLY not as angry as he comes across
and for the love of god, i do not inhale, havent in years, i just
like to stand up for those that do... as they shouldnt be persecuted
:) tw
On 7/8/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like a jerk, no he's demonstrated in the first sentance that he
> is a jerk. Actually I'd say major ass. The sort of person its not
> worth getting upset over.
>
> larry
>
> On 7/8/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, while I don't really get the poly lifestyle (trying to stay
> > emotionally connected to one man is enough, thanks), I definitely get
> > the distinction between poly and swinger.
> >
> > And, yah, that guy sounds like a jerk.
> >
> > On 7/8/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So... I'm sorry if some of you find this beyond the pale for the list,
> > > but you know, the HOF community lately is my only social outlet (as
> > > sad as that sounds), because my social groups in south Florida eroded
> > > while I was away last year.
> > >
> > > Many of you know that Tiff and I are bi/polyamorous -- or at least we
> > > consider ourselves to be, although in the past 5 years we've not found
> > > anyone we've been able to develop a good long-term poly relationship
> > > with. Tiff is subscribed to a number of poly mailing lists and
> > > yesterday someone posted an introduction on one of those lists saying
> > > they were poly and providing a link to their site/profile/whatever...
> > > So Tiff checked it out and it's all about sex/swinging -- the term
> > > polyamory (or any variation) isn't mentioned anywhere, just sex, sex
> > > and some more sex. So rather than lambast them (which happens to
> > > swingers who wander on to the wrong poly lists), Tiff sent a reply
> > > saying simply that it was a poly list and that as such they weren't
> > > very likely to receive the kind of response ("hey, ya wanna hook up?")
> > > they were likely interested in from that list. Apparently someone else
> > > on the list (not the moderator) took offense and lambasted her for
> > > pointing out the distinction between people who typically identify as
> > > poly ("relationships -- 'multiple _loves_' -- sex is good with people
> > > you love") and people who typically identify as swingers ("sex --
> > > probably only sex -- in many cases, 'love' with more than one person
> > > is scary and avoided like the plague").
> > >
> > > Excerpt from his response:
> > >
> > > ---------------------------
> > >
> > > My impression of a poly gathering so far is that bunch of unfuckables
> > > are coming together to prove their worth. Cuz if they know they are
> > > sexy, why stop when chemistry is right? Do we want to limit ourselves
> > > by definitions? Or do we want our love to be unlimited? Who can
> > > distinguish the purpose of sex from the purpose of relating? How can
> > > one relate to another without the ultimate closeness of genital
> > > contact? My brain hurts from these questions and too much tequilla...
> > > Cudos to all of you who know me in bed and yet did not form a
> > > relationship.. Next life, maybe..
> > >
> > > ---------------------------
> > >
> > > I dunno... it just seems to me like any reasonable person with a
> > > diverse set of emotions (like, I think most people have) should be
> > > able to tell the difference between someone who wants to _know_ you
> > > (your loves, your hates, your quirks, the "art" of you) and someone
> > > who just wants to get in your pants because they're addicted to the
> > > endorphine release of orgasm.
> > >
> > > For instance -- the "art" of Jim Davis (if you pay attention, there's
> > > a very definate style to all of his emails, a certain way he talks,
> > > and the way he uses the ^ character in emoticons) is very different
> > > from the "art" of mtangry (this is self-explanatory isn't it?) or Tony
> > > Weed... err... I mean Weeg. :) My moods vary (I hope most people's do)
> > > and although I'm not sexually attracted to _any_ of the
> > > afforementioned men (no offense guys, you're just not my type. :) I
> > > enjoy "hanging out" and talking about things (I hope most people do)
> > > and that experience would be different with each of them so I'd like
> > > to think it's natural that as my moods change, I would want to spend
> > > that time talking with different people. I wouldn't go pal-around with
> > > Jim when I'm mtAngry, because Jim doesn't seem like the sort of person
> > > who'd enjoy that mood. And I'm not likely to hang out with Tony much
> > > at all because, well, I don't know how to inhale. :P
> > >
> > > No wonder so many self-identified "poly people" have that knee-jerk
> > > response to swingers... <sigh>
> > >
> > > FUCK-WIT!
> > >
> > > /end rant...
> > >
> > > yeah, I'm in one of those mtAngry moods...
> > >
> > >
> > > s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
> > > new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
> > >
> > > add features without fixtures with
> > > the onTap open source framework
> > >
> > > http://www.fusiontap.com
> > > http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:163781
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
