If you've read all of the court documents (which by the way, aren't readily available) you would know that a single judge does not have jurisdiction in multiple courts.
The judge did not know the guy in question before any legal proceedings or he/she would have been legally required to dismiss his/herself from the case. Therefore your claim of bias in favor of the defendant based on his "being a nice guy" are totally baseless. The judge does not know if he is a nice guy. You are stating that the judge made the decision to ignore the evidence in question based on his/her personal feelings for the defendant. In fact, in order for such "ignoring of evidence" to stand up on appeal, the judge states why the evidence was discounted. Therefore it is a matter of law why the evidence was discounted. You stating that the judge was biased in contradiction to his/her stated reasons, which would be a deriliction of duty (which I believe was already appealed on and disagreed with) and possible perjury. The judge can prove his/her reasons, so making such an accusation is either libel or slander. Since you typed it, it's libel. The doctors who disagreed with the diagnosis did not personally examine her for an extended period of time-- many of them saw an edited video tape prepared by the family. The one guy who did disagree after having examined her in person very briefly had previously written articles claiming that her condition does not exist. He was already biased before he saw her and he is considered a crackpot in the medical community. Your experience with similar issues has great standing in this case. You are extremely biased against the person who repeatedly won legal judgements in this case. It doesn't matter to you how many judges agree with him or how many people supported his decision (more than half of this country) or how many doctors agree upon the diagnosis. All you care about is that there are legally unfounded accusations against him that may not have any bearing on the case whatsoever. That's your bias. And it's completely obvious that it's your bias and that you have personal issues with the accusation that make you tend to believe that they are true by default. As someone who also has personally issues involved with some aspects of this case, I do not want you representing me, and that is what you are pretending to do. You are biassed and irrational about the case, and not having been in this particular forum when previous discussions happened does not mean that I am uninformed. And the remark about religious beliefs is completely relevant too. I know a ton of people who change their religious beliefs and either do not inform their parents or have their parents fail to respect their change in religious beliefs. The parents and siblings specifically said that their family's religious beliefs do not support her husbands claims that she would not want to be kept alive artificially. She never talked to them about her wishes. With her family's strong religious beliefs, I doubt that she would have told them if she did not follow that same beliefs that they did. The reason that a husband has the authority to make these decisions instead of the family is that people are more honest with their spouses than with their parents. It honestly doesn't matter if you think she did or did not want to die the way that she did. Let the poor woman rest in peace already. -- "You can't destroy EVERYthing. Where would you sit?" The Tick Now for hire... http://www.blivit.org/mr_urc/index.cfm Now blogging.... http://www.blivit.org/blog/index.cfm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:164082 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
