> > 2.) Mr. Clinton had excellent foreign policy. While I can quibble > about N. Korea, Mr. Bush has made zero progress in 6 years and you > could easily argue he's went backwards. By that standard Mr. Clinton > is even if not better. >
I liked Clinton, but how can you say any of his major foreign policies were "excellent"? They seem like disasters to me. - Serbian massacres while NATO conducts operations in the former republic - Sunshine policy towards North Korea resulting in a false treaty behind which NK worked toward nuclear capabilities without us knowing - Lobbed a few cruise missiles into Afghanistan, missing Bin Laden by a few minutes. Kinda like attacking a 4 alarm blaze with a water gun. - Completely ignored terrorist preparations in Syria, Afghanistan, etc.... I'm not sure Bush is doing any better.......but Clinton "excellent" on foreign policy? You really think so? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:166605 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
