Using a generic dictionary for a legal or medical definition is silly. It's fine for basic common use definitions, but not for precise legal, medical, or technical definitions.
-Kevin On 8/9/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now wait a minute. You might want to re-read your definition. > > There were 3 different definitions, labelled 1-3. Any of which could > identify a "drug". However, definition 1 had two subsections to it, a) and > b). > > So for a substance to satisfy definition 1, it had to both a) be used in > diagnosis, treatment or prevention AND b) be recognized or defined by the US > Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. > > Sugar might be used to treat certain conditions, but if it aint listed in > that Act...it aint a drug. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:168608 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
