Yes, but with the new so called American Patriotism Act, roving electronic wiretaps (i.e.., Carnivore) would not require the same judicial protections as current wiretap laws.
larry -- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com http://www.pacel.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:15 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Two points and then back to work > > > Where did you hear that? This is from the FBI website. It's > the link > that I posted just a few minutes ago. > > "Under Title III, applications for interception require the > authorization of a high-level Department of Justice (DOJ) official > before the local United States Attorneys offices can apply for such > orders. Interception orders must be filed with federal district court > judges or before other courts of competent jurisdiction. " > > That would make you wrong. > > Michael Corrigan > Programmer > Endora Digital Solutions > www.endoradigital.com > 630/942-5211 x-134 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Larry Lyons > To: CF-Community > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:09 AM > Subject: RE: Two points and then back to work > > > However wiretaps require a warrant from a court, Carnivore does not > have > this requirement. Personally I think that before installing or > activating > Carnivore should require an equivalent warrant. > > larry > > -- > Larry C. Lyons > ColdFusion/Web Developer > EBStor.com > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > tel: (703) 393-7930 > fax: (703) 393-2659 > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > http://www.pacel.com > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > -- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:52 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Two points and then back to work > > > > > > Carnivore is considered, by law, to be akin to something like > > wire tapping - so, just like phone companies can't > refuse, neither > can > > ISP's. > > > > Howie > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Kevin Gilchrist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:48 AM > > Subject: RE: Two points and then back to work > > > > > > > Far better to grab the keys and passwords that to force > > decrypt packets, > > > heh heh. > > > > > > From what I'd heard a lot of ISP's had baulked at > > installing Carnivore > > > until 9/11 after which time, I could have sworn I read > > somewhere, that > > > legislation was pushed through mandating the installation? > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
