-- BEGIN SARCASM -- Aww... heck, why don't we just implement this:
http://tinyurl.com/aa8nv ....rating system -- END SARCASM -- *chuckle* -Erik (personally labeling himself as a big ol' 'O' ) >Rated movies submit themselves for ratings, which is generally required >for being shown in theatres. Video releases, however, don't have to be >rated. Basically, the rating is only necessary if you want someone else >to show your movie in public. > >So, given that porn sites aren't getting paid by theatres to have the >movies shown, what's the overriding reason they'll go with this system? > >Not that I necessarily disagree with the .xxx suffix. I just don't >think "x-rated stuff goes here" is enforcable. > >--Ben > >Ken Ketsdever wrote: > > >>What is the difference between movie ratings? >> >>G >>PG >>R >>X >> >>Apply similar standards. If the content of a site would receive a "R" >>rating according to movie standards then it does not have to have a .xxx >>extension. >> >>If the content would receive a movie rating of X then the site needs >>..xxx It works in the movie industry it could work here too. >> >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Now thereâs a better way to fax. eFax makes it possible to use your existing email account to send and receive faxes. Try eFax free. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=63 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169615 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
