Sam, lighten up. I don't remember much about DeLorean. I was (kinda) kidding about Rove. That's why I started the next sentence with "seriously." No, it is not acceptable to lock innocent people up. However, Rove is not innocent even if he didn't do this one, which I don't believe for a minute.
Dana On 10/11/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/11/05, Dana wrote: > > ah, it's not acceptable, doesn't mean that certain people don't > *deserve* > > it. Seriously though, Barry was guilty, no question, I just decry using > an > > ex to get to him. > > When you say Barry was guilty do you also agree DeLorean was guilty? > Yes he's guilty of trying to cheat on his wife but the drugs? He said > no like eight times to the drugs, finally gave in just to get some. > That may say a lot about his character but guilty isn't one of them. > The word is entrapment. > > > > This is somewhat different. Rove is guilty, there is no > > prosecutorial malfeasance, and even if he weren't.... it couldn't happen > to > > a nicer guy. > > So even if Rove did nothing illegal we should lock him up on trumped > up charges because you don't like him? You have become one of those > whom you despise. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:176841 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
