If the University of PA study I posted late last night doesn't do this to your satisfaction, then I don't know what to say. I do think it would take regression analysis and though I have limped through one or two a while back it would take more time and resources than I personally have available to do a complete model. I'll check the other thread to see what if anything you have to say about it.
I have to admit though, I am getting tired of the topic and I suspect everyone else is too. Dana >>3> The effect on the local economy of a Wal-Mart store is often negative. > >That is the point I have yet to see anyone prove. > >Quite simply this should be quantifiable. Wal-Mart has been following the >same practices in a great different types of economies successfully for >decades now. Your point should be easy to prove, with available >quantifiable data, released by cities and citizens that have been burned by >"the system". These numbers do not exist anywhere online that I can find. >What I find reads more like "the government did it" paranoia that we heard >after 9/11. > >Tim > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:55 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193116 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
