> Jerry wrote: > The "scandal" involves the handling of the event itself, the > appearance of a media cover-up or intentional delay, and the > allegations of media disdain. >
Yup, it's a point of process or "best practices". Sure there's the this-is-a-small-deal argument, but anyone who breaks the rules for something like this is likely to do it for other things. At least that's been my experience with human beings. Take development. You've got some developers that document everything they do and always unit test no matter how small the change. When things go wrong with the build it's rarely, if ever, them. Then there's the coders that don't respect the process and rarely follow it. When things go wrong it's almost always them. So what this does is cast doubt on Cheney's credibility when it comes to, say, following the process in wiretapping American citizens. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197049 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
