Considering the US is the only country to have used Atomic weapons in war, and is the only superpower in the world, and has proven a willingness and ability to unilaterally invade and destroy a soverign state...then yes. If you do not agree with BUsh's tactics one can easily see how he would be termed a larger threat.
He is the head of the only Superpower in the world which can project it's military might globally. On 3/17/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then you are not thinking very hard. Personal hatred for Bush seems to be > clouding the judgement of a lot of otherwise serious, rational people. > > So, in an honest evaluation, you decided that the Bush administration was > more dangerous than: > > 1. Al Qaeda, a terrorist organization whose stated goal is to wipe out the > Western world and install an Islamic empire from Spain to Indonesia > 2. Iran, an Islamic theocracy whose stated goal is to destroy Israel and > hasten the return of the 12th Imam i.e. by starting WW III. > 3. North Korea, a slave state with nuclear weapons run by a lunatic with a > god complex. > > Is that right? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200542 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
