I think you are definitely free to try to change the law. I don't think it is right to break the law.
And if you do break the law, I think you should be punished to the full extent of the law. We also disagree that the law is unneccessary. Apparently, enough people disagree that the law still stands. On 4/11/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JJ wrote: > > It sounds like the law breaking part of this whole thing really > > doesn't matter to you at all. > > > > Do you feel this way about other laws, or just this one? > > > > Well, we've kinda covered this, but, to be polite, I'll give you my 2ยข: > > Law and order is the mechanism that separates free societies from > dictatorships. Of course the key is that it's the people that need to > make the law, not the government. > > That having been said, many laws can be anachronistic, unnecessary, or > stupid. When this happens they must be purged like the remnants of a > cheap Mexicans dinner. > > In this case, the current law doesn't meet the needs of the people and > so, as a free citizen, I'm free to disagree with it - even overturn > it. That starts by making my case, which I'm doing here. Thus begins > the process of making law. > > So, in order to respect the law, you must destroy some to save some. > Ironic, huh? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203831 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
