I have to admit that I wouldn't agree to either of those things. They are not our problem. As far as I am concerned humanitarian should never be used outside of domestic issues.
-- Timothy Heald Analyst, Architect, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: 202-228-8372 C: 703-300-3911 -----Original Message----- From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:19 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Bush reconfirms nuking Iran, sorry :) > tBone wrote: > That's a world government. The whole 1984 new world order nonsense bro. > That's what people hyperbolize it into, but it's not. It's simply a peace keeping and humanitarian body that we can assign the problems to that nobody wants. I bet if we took a poll, just about everyone in the world would agree that the mass slaughters that take place in Africa should be stopped. By who? And that's why they continue to happen. And that's where you need somebody to step in. That's a waste of resources and therefore anti-capitalist. Then there's the humanitarian issues. You have backward countries with starving people because they lack the education and infrastructure to prevent it. That's a waste of resources and therefore anti-capitalist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205126 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
