well let's see your most recent post does some namecalling but cites no 
sources....this is to improve on a post where your souce is semi-reputable but 
about 1500 pages long. Um.

>Deep in the weeds? You're shitting me :)
>You get all your so-called facts from your gut feelings that Bush is an idiot.
>Almost everything you claim can easily be disproved by REAL facts, not
>hunches. You are always in the weeds because you don't use facts and
>always personally attack people when they call you on it. When I bash
>you with my "perceived facts", I always back them with reputable
>sources. You on the other hand always come out with; "well I know
>three people from ___ and they all say ___."
>Just because you can't find facts to support your vitriol doesn't mean
>that facts disproving them are automatically dismissible.
>
>Now here you are bashing me while telling me not to bash people, get
>off your high horse and have look at yourself.
>
>
>On 5/18/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207072
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to