Well, it apparently wan't known by you ;) but it's been out there for several years at least.
I am coming into this halfway through, but it seems clear from the wikipedia article that the company would have gone bust had it not been bailed out, and it most likely *was* bailed out as an attempt to purchase influence. So if you are going to hold Gruss to the use of bankrupt as a legal term, it would seem he was wrong. On the other hand, he is not a lawyer nor does he play one on TV, so why should you? Bottom line -- the history of that company is no testament to W's managerial skills. >What stuff has been known? It seems people make claims that aren't >backed up by evidence then somebody else points some other direction. > >This thing started with, name a company he didn't bankrupt, then a >couple are named, and boom something else. Oh well he didn't bankrupt it >because it of this or that. > >It's the same crap that people have been trying for years. Somebody >points something out that is suspicious but it is done to the extreme. >And all the other side has to do is point a couple of holes in it, and >it goes away. > >It all revolves around a long line of coincidences that can't be linked. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:41 PM >To: CF-Community >Subject: Re: treasure trove of documents recovered in Iraq > >more detail: > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harken_Energy_Scandal > >::shrug:: this stuff has been known for quite a while. > >Dana > >for... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209800 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
