I'd probably have to go read it again and do some research to really decide. I don't believe it is bunk because it contradicts teh Democratic party, though. Offhand, I tend to believe somethng that gives its sources above something that doesn't, though.
> So they all seem to be saying the RFK article is bunk ;) > > On 6/19/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > > hmm. Don't have much time right now but the article seems to be > saying that Kennedy is wrong because he is contradicting the > Democratic Party, and besides, the last election was no more corrupt > than the one before it. Um ;/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209962 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
