the trouble with this logic is that if you extrapolate it a bit, you could invade any country for any past wrong. I mean -- let's invade Germany for being mean to France, why don't we.
>I thought there were 15+ documented violations of the cease fire agreement >since 1991? I mean independently verified, by the UN, violations that had >nothing to do with WMD's. This is what I'd always heard and read. Didn't >Iraq kick the inspectors out entirely 5 or so years back? That's an obvious >violation. > >Let's be clear: I'm not justifying our invasion. But from everything I've >seen, it WAS legally justified by the terms of the previous cease fire. > >On 6/23/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210174 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
