>hehe. can't take the gloating? > >No FUD here. The Post started out pushing the story and only got on the >other side of things in 2004 after it became clear that Joe Wilson was a big >fat liar. Good for them, but they were on the wrong side of the story at the >start. > >Here is a story from Oct 2003 about Wilson meeting aniel Ellsberg, the guy >who leaked the Pentagon papers. > >*http://tinyurl.com/ryzf* > >The paper specifically tried, in this article, to give Wilson the moral >authority of Ellsberg.
Section C of the Washington Post is the lifestyle section. Not the editorial page. There is a difference. That's typically where you find stuff involving brain dead models and the like - Brittney Spears latest belly button ring in other words. Editorial sections usually mean newspaper policy. In case you have not noticed, the lifestyle section means fluff. Now newspapers in San Diego where you are may be run differently, but the last time I checked, the Washington Post's style section has a differrent staff and has very different set of policies than the editorial page. Mind you California has long seemed to place more importance on fluff than on gravitas. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:214721 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
