As Tim points out, the prisons were never really all that secret. I remember when they first captured Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, they said he was being held "at an undisclosed location". That's good enough for me.
The best part of this story is the conclusion. We aren't going to hold them in secret any longer. So where are we taking them? Guantanamo! That's awesome. Enjoy the ceviche, fellas! On 9/6/06, Gruss wrote: > > > RoMunn wrote: > > U.S. Big friggin' > > deal. > > For those of us that are paranoid of the government, any government, > we don't like the government having secret anything. Especially > prisons. > > Of course the gov't needs facilities like this, but I see no reason > why they can't disclose them and who's in them. If the prisoners do > need their identities secret, then the Senate should know. > > The bottom line is I don't want a government empowered to hold > undisclosed people indefinitely. > > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:214901 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
