I'd agree with that. I don't think that if it is directly done by the government it would classify as terrorism. As I thought terrorism fell into a specific category based on the intent; where the intent was to destabilize a government.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 10:13 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Dems git r done > > um ok so what happene to the kurds wasn't terrorism, just genocide? > > On 11/12/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was talking about the specific support of Iraq for the purposes of the > Iran war. That wasn't supporting terrorism. > > > > If Iraq used that support during terrorist operations against somebody > else then maybe it would be supporting terrorism. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220507 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
