Well, I don't know that I would be outraged.  Like I said, they weren't
called to investigate a crime.  They were called there to escort the guy out
of the place 'after hours'.  That's all there should have been to it.  If he
went free and did something .. naughty, I don't think anyone could blame the
police for thinking he was nothing more than a loud mouthed kid trying to
make a statement at the time.  At least, they shouldn't.

Anyway, the argument isn't really whether he should have been detained at
all, but the amount of force used to detain him.  I know of a tweaked out
drug user who stole 2 cars, a boat and held a family hostage in their home
at knife point that had an easier arrest than this kid.

The amount of force used to detain the kid was very disproportional to what
was actually needed.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Stroz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <cf-community@houseoffusion.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: more civil rights goodness


> I beg to differ.  I think its all about politics.  My problem is not so
much
> with the fact that people are coming down on the police, rather that some
of
> the same people being vocal about how they handled this would be outraged
if
> this guy was actually doing something criminal and the police let him get
> away.
>
> I can't stand the 'Monday Morning Quarterback' mentality of cases like
this.
>
>
> -- 
> Scott Stroz


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:221361
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to