Your argument is backwards, it was the Democrats that fought those Republican laws.
On 1/19/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You mean that they should ignore case law and other decisions. Also by > extension toss out most legal decisions since 1790 or so, prohibit women's > vote or the vote by minority groups, blacks, Catholics and others. That > wasn't the intent of the framers to allow those voting rights. > > So much for constitutional law and the Constitution being a living document. > Given what you said, then its OK for slavery to be reinstituted - hey it was > there when the Constitution was written and several of the framers were > specifically pro-slavery. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225225 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
