> Larry wrote: > Since Habeas Corpus has not only the force of law, but given its specific > mention in the constitution, and in several treaties then statutory law > cannot ban it. There is not a state of rebellion in the US nor is it under > invasion. Therefore Habeas Corpus applies. End of story. >
Of course the irony is that many in same party that were appalled at Pres Clinton's ridiculous detailed parsing of his own language over a BJ are NOT appalled at Gonzo's ridiculous parsing of the Constitution. Thus many in the Republican party seem to be implicitly offended at BJ defense, but have no offense at blatant attacks on the Constitution. That about sums up Neo-cons. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225954 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
