More accountability. I don't think you should be able to say whoops, that batch of drugs is toxic, so let's sell it in South America. Or gee, we could clean up our toxic slop from the 50s but it's so much easier to just be reborn as another company and let Superfund pick up the tab.
I don't have a ten point plan on this, but the logic behind say campaign reform is real reform would make politicians more accountable to their actual constituents that they are to their contributors. Note the word real. This in turn may lead to more rational regulation. Though I must say that the little I have had time to look at about the TXU sale is encouraging... maybe 30 years is overly pessimistic. On 2/26/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > well they are pretty entrenched you know, so that's a big question. I > > suppose that campaign finance reform might be a start. It's a start > > that would probably take 30 years to take effect, but it's a start. > > > > What's the goal? The elimination of corporations or better regulation > or more transparency? What'cha shootin for? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:228962 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
