It does work TOWARDS a conviction. It is the first statement made to indicate their MAY be a violation. Such statements are used to initiate inquires to find witnesses, evidence etc.. Until Monica admitted she hadn't done her dry cleaning in a year or more their was no evidence against Clinton. She said, he said. Not much different than what certain members of the current administration are going through. And I am convinced that some of them, just like Clinton are lying to protect themselves and others knowing that it will be difficult to find the smoking gun.
The difference is you tend to trust and believe them. I tend to think they are lying and covering stuff up. I can't wait for this administration to end. I would like someone in the white house I can support. I liked Reagan. Bush Sr. was ok. Clinton I disliked for the most part but especially since he's been gone I've really started to change my mind about him. Bush jr. was ok at first, especially in his handling of 9/11 , Afghanistan. Since that time he and his cronies have made one blunder after another and comes across as a bunch of arrogant, a_holes who think they are above the law. Sam wrote: > I'm looking for: we have evidence... we have a witness... > At least something they can present to a court. > She "may have " doesn't work towards a conviction. > > On 5/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> America, Innocent until proven guilty. Hence "may have". time will >> determine >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:233929 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
