OK, but we are "supposed" to be allies with Russia, so what is the big deal? >From what I read, we are not supposed to be concerned with Russia's missiles so much as we are concerned about a rogue state's missiles. Since some of those possible rogue states are in that continent, then we should have the missile defense positioned in that region. And if they are concerned about us bombing them, then they should build their own missile defenses. Better yet, they could do a better job of accountability for the missiles they have. Here is a report on that:
http://www.cdi.org/friendlyversion/printversion.cfm?documentID=3947 Here is another link of interest: http://www.cdi.org/program/index.cfm?programid=6 -----Original Message----- From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:21 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Can you justify... I think it goes like this: We could shoot down a missile, and they couldn't. The one constant during the Cold War that kept things from boiling over was the idea of Mutual Annihilation. That is, no one could win, everyone would be destroyed, so there was no impetus to initiate. If one side could effectively thwart another's nuclear arsenal...then that balance is upset. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:235363 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
