seriously, that would be my best pick.  Doesn't Java have a bunch of
embedded db's to pick from also?  If not, why not just put something
like sqlite.

On 5/31/07, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, well this is a new version of the server we're talking about.
>
> How about adding "embedded db" as an option?
>
> Haha
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:05 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: cf8 and client variables
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:38 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: cf8 and client variables
> >
> > I disagree.  I think making it cookie out of the box makes more sense.
> >
> > IMHO if you don't what a cookie is you have no business installing an
> > application server.
>
> It's not just knowing what a cookie is - it's knowing how using cookies
> changes the way client-variables behave.
>
> For what it's worth "Cookie" is definitely the odd-man out in this option:
> I'm honestly not sure why it was included.  "Cookie" really does nothing
> beyond CFCOOKIE.  In this case it also changes the nature of client
> variables compared to the other options: they're not stored on the server,
> they're limited in size, they're limited in number, etc.
>
> The "Cookie" option really just doesn't fit - defaulting the system to using
> the exception to the rule seems wrong to me.  At the very least I can
> understand the argument.
>
> Jim Davis
>
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:235886
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to