It's a rebuttal of a left wing attack on the president...doh! And then you talk of money... You're meandering and I have better things to do.
I know how "neh" is being used I just don't understand why. Must be a myspace thing On 8/6/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/5/07, Cousin Sam wrote: > > On 8/1/07, Stoner wrote: > > > > > Hmm.... where are you when Larry says stuff like "too many > > > to claim "isolated incidents""? Holding your fingers in your > > > ears and going la la la la la la la la LA LA LA LA? > > > > We go through this every couple of months and I respond and then > > crickets. Here we go again: > > Maybe your response got lost? Or do you mean in general? Eh... > > > Response to Union of Concerned Scientists Document > > http://www.ostp.gov/html/ucs.html1 > > > > Take your fingers out of your ears and respond please. > > Well, I think it's funny how often the President's name gets mentioned > therein. But what good does more money do if the bastards are trying > to control the flow, based on political/religious beliefs? > > I don't see how that link addresses the issue at hand, Sam. > > Do you honestly think that this administration hasn't exerted undue > influence in the arena of Science? Hell, in the Law arena, the fiscal > responsibilities arena... shONEt, dude, how much can you take > before you're like: "no more!"? Do you even care about this great > Nation? =] > > > > This ain't rocket, science, Sam. Yet it seems like you've got > > > blinders on, full tilt. Aren't you upset at how this makes the > > > "good" conservatives look? How it reflects on those that put > > > these fools in power? > > > > No, I'm upset at how it makes liberals look. I know most mean well but > > the few that shout the loudest are the ones with blinders on and it > > doesn't look good for the rest. > > It makes liberals look like they don't want things like Religion to sway > things like Science, or Law, or things of that nature- any Good Citizen > should know this stuff, the fact that it's gotten so far is freakishly sad. > > But don't count me in any group. The Democrats talked big about things > like reform and whatnot, but where's that talk now? We were shown > proof our system has some serious "issues", yet, "crickets", as you say, > from those who are supposed to be representing our wishes. Bah! > > At least they aren't responsible for the current sorry affair- well, > not directly, > I reckon, tho this whole two party, "restricted access"-debates crap is > suspect in the high. > > *sigh* > > > > Ah... now, I think, we maybe getting closer. > > > > No, you're still ost :) > > All those who wander... and those that wonder... > > > > I bet you voted for Nader, neh? > > > > What's neh? Is that the sound a horse makes? > > Neehehehehe, or Nay, even. It's like "no?"- so it reads: > I bet you voted for Nader, no? or, perhaps: > I bet you voted for Nader, right? > > But to figure that out you'd have to have some of that > critical thinking type whatnot going on, which, well- > makes one wonder. There's a whole 'nother level to > the comment, once you figure out that first bit. =] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies around the world in government. Find out how and where now http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=finder&productID=1522&loc=en_us Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:239632 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
