So I came across this article: http://news.com.com/Police+Blotter+Defendant+wins+breathalyzer+source+code/2100-7348-6201632.html?part=dht&tag=nl.e703
We all know that the best way to bog down a case and possibly get it thrown out is to file one discovery motion after another (works when you get pulled over by a speed gun, ask for documentation of when the device was last calibrated, baseline tests, and when the last time the officer was certified on it), but I never heard of this. Apparently, according to the article, this is not precedence. Interesting none the less. -- Bruce ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies around the world in government. Find out how and where now http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=finder&productID=1522&loc=en_us Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:239815 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5