We are and always have been.

On 8/20/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So ... there's data that says it could be happening, and maybe bad,
> but here's also things that say it may not be (your links).  Beyond
> that, if there is GW (meaning not "common cause" variance, but
> "special cause" variance) it may be human caused or natural.
>
> So, given all that, wouldn't you agree that we should be taking action
> if only to manage the risk that GW is occurring?  Part of that action
> would be determine cause, as much as possible (since you'd have to
> take action you need to determine as best as possible the cause, i.e.,
> human or not).
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:240794
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to