Studio 60 started being shown in the UK recently, I had thought it was
comedy not reality TV...

On 12/09/2007, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay - yeah, I've got the same bug up my ass as usual... but still:
>
> Apparently Kathy Griffin won an Emmy for something.  Fine.
>
> Now her acceptance speech is being censored during the broadcast because
> she
> made some comments about Jesus and God.  Specifically:
>
> "A lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this award. I want you
> to
> know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus. Suck it,
> Jesus.
> This award is my god now."
>
> Tactless, crude, in-your-face - sure.  That does seem to describe Kathy
> Giffin.  However the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights claims
> that this is "hate speech".  The called it "obscene and
> blasphemous."  It's
> a hugely powerful, hugely privileged majority playing the beset minority
> card... made all the more ridiculous since Griffin is herself Catholic.
>
> She spoke, they responded - that's the way it works.  However the Academy
> has bowed to the pressure.  They've announced that "Kathy Griffin's
> offensive remarks will not be part of the E! telecast."  Of course there's
> nothing in her statements that would HAVE to be censored (she has a foul
> mouth but she constrained herself here).
>
> One part of me says: "Sure - it's there damn show.  They should do it how
> they like."  At the same time I'm truly struggling to see how this works:
> she's a brash, in-your-face comic.  She's being AWARDED by this academy
> for
> those very features (the show for which she won is a reality show after
> all).
>
> So she's being punished for EXACTLY THE SAME BEHAVIOR that won her the
> award
> in the first place!
>
> I can also see no way in which her comments could be construed as "hate
> speech": she was either speaking about her personal opinion of an abstract
> figure or specifically about a single individual. She either mocked an
> imaginary figurehead or a specific individual - there was nothing even
> approaching comments about a group or class.  In addition she herself is a
> member of the class claiming to have been attacked.
>
> I've got no problem with the group criticizing her speech.  I've actually
> got no real problem with the actual censorship - again, it's their show.
>
> It's completely hypocritical.  They clap her on the back tell her she's
> great then she does what she's always done and they slap her in the face
> for
> it.  Cowards.
>
> Jim Davis
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder,
plug-ins for Eclipse and Dreamweaver updates.
http;//www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs%5adobecf8%5Fbeta

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:242294
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to