What he said :-) -----Original Message----- From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 January 2008 13:15 To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Oh dear God no.....
I'm not getting into this again. You are wrong. Have a great day. On Jan 4, 2008 2:33 PM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the pattern I am already seeing on this thread is that it is OK to > teach one theory, but not another? I thought the point of educating was > to present both sides of an argument? So if this is the case, then why > not introduce both sides, pro and con Darwinism as well as both sides of > ID? After all, it is just a theory like Evolution, right? > When I was reading my daughters science book, they did have Darwin's > Theory in a chapter. I read the whole chapter and it only presented the > pro-Darwinism argument and offered absolutely no counter-argument. This > ID document I just read actually says that they should teach Evolution, > but not teach only pro-Darwinism but teach the critiques of Darwinism as > well. And, they do NOT advocate forcing the teachings of ID in the > classroom, but rather say that if a science teacher WANTS to teach ID, > they should, but only if informed enough to teach it responsibly. So > what is the problem here? > > Bruce > > Throttle Jockey - > Why golf courses should be motocross tracks > > > Vivec wrote: > > The part where they took fantasy and tried to equate it to science. > > > > On Jan 4, 2008 4:15 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> That was interesting, what part scared you? > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249904 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
