Reagan personally? Or his advisers? The big thing when he was running for
election was, sure he, doesn't have much experience, but he has a track
record of surrounding himself with really smart people. (Smart people I
disagree with, but that's another story).

On 1/13/08, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Initially yes, I know his Alzheimer's caused some problems during the end
> of
> his second term, but by that point he had charted the course that would
> lead
> to the end of the cold war.  Even Bush Sr. was often only following up on
> policies of the Regan administration.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 4:56 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Best Political Speech
>
> Actually no, I really think that. But I know you don't. Just curious -- I
> know you agree with the policies, but do you think they were his?
>
> On 1/13/08, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hahahahah
> > Hmmmmmmmmm
> >
> > /me sense some troll in that.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 4:10 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Best Political Speech
> >
> > Reagan was a tool
> >
> > ::flees::
> >
> >
> > On 1/13/08, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Look into Mena Arkansas.
> > >
> > > Clinton really was equally as corrupt as Bush.  I'd say we go back to
> > > Regan
> > > to find a man that tried to do what he said.  Then probably Kennedy.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 3:36 AM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: Re: Best Political Speech
> > >
> > > On 1/12/08, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 12, 2008 10:10 AM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I wasn't talking about anything besides their existence.
> > > > >
> > > > > You aren't one of those people who goes to the funerals with the
> > signs
> > > > > saying the dead are going to burn in hell are you?  =]
> > > >
> > > > You're the one that uses signs as some sort of validation.
> > >
> > > As their own validation.  Was there crap like that going down during
> > > Clinton's reign?
> > >
> > > > > > Lying under oath, obstructing justice and witness tampering
> while
> > > > > > President is peachy with you?
> > > > > > Are you as upset with Anita Hill as you were with Paula Jones,
> > > > > > Cathleen Wiley and Juanita Broderick?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm pretty sure you're not a real.  Has anyone actually met Sam in
> > > > > person?  Are you sure you're not Gruss? ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Split personality? I don;t think so :)
> > >
> > > Stranger things have happened. :]
> > >
> > > > > Seriously, you'd impeach for that, but not what Walker has done?
> > > >
> > > > You didn't answer the question.
> > > > And what do you claim to be an impeachable offense? Something more
> > > > concrete than a sign held up at rally please.
> > >
> > > On principle, Clinton's transgressions weren't right, but on the
> > > practical, the sex scandal vs. the current affair?  Pardon the lame
> > > pun.  Heh.
> > >
> > > The domestic spying probably pisses me off the most Re: Walker, but
> > > there are really too many to list.  Bringing God into the political
> > > system again.  Bah.  Too much, it hurts to think about it. [=
> > >
> > > > > Are you even an American?
> > > >
> > > > What a bizarre question. But if we turn it around, hmmm are you?
> > >
> > > I'm just pissed that some people care more about a sex scandal than
> > > they do about issues of truly scandalous natures.
> > >
> > > > > Let me guess, you're one of the ones who helped keep this joker in
> > > > > office, aren't you?  You work for dibold!  :-P
> > > >
> > > > Ah, still have Bush Derangment Syndrome. I hear there is no cure.
> Bush
> > > > won now get over it :p
> > >
> > > Oh, I'm not too deranged.  There weren't any riots by outraged,
> > > defrauded voters.  I'm all for conspiracy theories and whatnot, but we
> > > at least half-way, deserved him twice.
> > >
> > > That alone is shameful-- but what the hell, you probably shouldn't be
> > > on top all the time anyways.
> > >
> > > > > I've said it before, I'll say it again-- I nub you Sam! *hugs*
> > > >
> > > > Right back at you :)
> > > >
> > > > > (Seriously-- thanks for your input)
> > > >
> > > > I'm here to entertain
> > >
> > > Excellent.  I've run into some of your arguments "in the wild", so
> > > it's been nice trying to hone my counterarguments.
> > >
> > > --
> > > All human situations have their inconveniences. We feel those of the
> > > present but neither see nor feel those of the future; and hence we
> > > often make troublesome changes without amendment, and frequently for
> > > the worse.
> > >    Benjamin Franklin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:250622
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to