I've been down that road before. I had a server that ran the latest version of BD that was available to run free as a server. It was a pain finding out that things didn't necessarily run the same way on BD as it did on CF. Plus were already invested in CF licenses.
As for a bogus reason...well, with Ruby/Rails, or any other open source language, I can set up the same environments on testing, staging and production without worrying about licensing. I don't have to worry about a devnet version putting up a meta tag stating it's the devnet version and killing all the ajax/xml calls. I don't have to worry about only two coworkers being able to see the site. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't that more than a bit of a bogus reason. Besides if you're so worried > about it, you could install BlueDragon JX or Railo, they have more liberal > rules for their developers versions. Also there's the BlueDragon Open source > version for J2EE that's going to be out very shortly. > > >"A License exception has been thrown" > > > >One more reason it can be easier to develop in Rails vs CF....I tried > >to get 3 people to comment on some mods I was doing to the web site. > >First two got in....third got the above message. > > > >I know that you don't want people using dev versions for hosting, but > >it seems that there are better ways of limiting access. > > > >zB > > > > > >"So I mixed up the batter and she licked the beater!" > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257802 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
