> > In other words you believe the crap you want to, > > I do. As long as it confirms your own biases you mean.
> > > and damn the objective evidence. > > I have an eye for the obvious. Nothing about that abstract would lead > me to believe it was objective. Quite the opposite. So as I said, you prefer your own prejudices and will not investigate anything that will contradict it. You know keeping one's head in the sand makes breathing difficult Sam. > > > Isn't magical thinking wonderful. > > You seem happy. You're right I am, I have a very skeptical view of things and form my own opinions based on evidence, not crappy pablum spoon fed to me by an obese brain dead drug addict. > > > Believe what you want and screw the > evidence. > > What evidence? Did you pay the $15 to find out if they had any > evidence that proves Fox is more biased than al Jazeera? I did. Because I wanted to see what the rating system was and if it was a valid rating system. Also it did not hurt that since I have had articles in other journals published by the same company I got a small discount. I saw how they did their rating and while not perfect, it made good empirical sense. The scales appeared to have a high degree of face validity. In other words I don't let my biases drive my conclusions, I prefer to let the the data dictate. Nor do I let a confirmatory bias colour my interactions. Frankly Sam you have made it very clear that despite whatever real evidence there is, you will dismiss it out of hand because it contradicts your prejudices. Such a narrow world view. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:260160 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
