> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:38 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Keith Barry does Brainmagic.
> 
> So....those geniuses on CF-Community...
> Can you explain any of these? :)
> 
> http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/keith_barry_does_brain_magic.html

I've not watched it yet... but I will start by stating the obvious:

Not knowing how something is done does not make it magic.  ;^)

Also I would bet that everything I'm about to see is old hat.  Common carnie
tricks in use by other magicians.  Very little is really "new" - at best
much of it using the same old gimmicks in new ways.

Now, I'm watching the thing, if I know the tricks... here be spoilers!


1) The trick with the hands is just that: a trick.  Trying watching the
trick with the volume off - it's easier to see without the vocal
distraction.  This one needs a bit of practice (my fat old arms don't turn
as smoothly as his) but it's clear when you actually watch his hands (they
actually change position during a camera change which makes this a quasi
"camera trick" but I doubt he needed it).

It's similar to the old dare where you present something awful (a glass of
urine, a plate of feces or something similar) and claim that you'll taste it
on a bet.  The trick is to quickly dip a finger (usually your ring finger)
into the substance but then lick your index finger (you can wipe of both
fingers as if you're wiping off your saliva).  If done fast enough, with
confidence (maintaining eye contact helps immensely) most people will assume
that you've actually tasted the substance.

They see a movement (sticking a finger into the glass, putting your hands
together) and assume either habit or symmetry.  All the performer has to do
is alter that while allowing you to keep your assumptions.

2) The blindfolded drive one is just an old carnie trick.  Note that he
maintains complete control over the blindfold.  In most cases this is with a
two-sided blindfold and hood: put them on one way and it's opaque, put on
another way (usually reversed, backwards) and it's not.

So it's easy enough to "prove" the power by placing the blindfold on
somebody and asking "can you see through"?  You then just place the gear on
the "right" way and you can see and do anything you like.

In the carnie trick the performer (often a one-eyed man who can "see with
his spirit eye") will ask for something personal to read, like a wallet, and
amaze the audience by offering up information only available via sight when
it's clear he "couldn't be seeing".

The very fact that the performer in this case maintained complete control
over all the gear in use argues perfectly for this old trick.  Note that it
also features a common deceptive element: over guarding of non-important
elements.  Cameras covered the car, care was taken to show that the person
didn't know him, etc.

This is similar to the magician's habit of having people pull, knock, smack
and otherwise test the chains, the box and the bag before the classic escape
trick... when all he really needs is the key that his assistant hands him as
she helps him into the box.


3) I'm not sure but my guess is simply shills.  Magicians will tell you that
they never met these people... but guess what?  Magician's lie.  In this
case they may not be shills (but they still could be).

Note that during the "invisible touch" gag his hand disappears behind her
back quite a while before he makes a show of "not touching her".  He could
have tapped her then.  When he "doesn't touch" her arm he gets quite close
and is moving rapidly: more than enough for air to "tickle" the hair on her
arm (note that she really doesn't answer him - he provides the description
and she just confirms it).

Next notice that the table cloth of the table is draped all the way to the
floor and that the performer sits next to him - it would be easy for the
performer to cue the subject with a foot tap (and in fact we see movement).
Even if the subject isn't a shill note the phrases used: if the performer
were just pressing on the subject foot with his (hidden foot) the trick
would work the same way.

The subject would move when "pressure" was applied - all they need to do is
follow instructions,  perhaps thinking that this was a prelude to the "real
trick" - before they know it, they're being ushered off stage: job well
done!

With the bottle, as with the blindfold: the performer completely controls
everything making the trick incredibly suspect.  A bottle may be treated to
break in a lot of ways (especially if the subject is in on the trick).

Some people have suggested that the bottle was prestressed in a such a way
that it maintained its strength from the outside, but was fragile from the
inside (even a small crack would extend and shatter the bottom).  Others
have suggested that the "shard of glass" was actually something else.

In any case it's impossible to consider this as proof of actual "mind over
matter" when some many variables are left open.

4) The simplest explanation to me for the spike trick is marked equipment.

Again we see a blindfold "tested" by the subject (we know that's suspect to
begin with).  A small mark, easy enough to spot when you know what you're
looking for would suffice to let him know where the spike is.  It doesn't
even have to be a specific mark: these are wooden discs: a distinct grain
pattern is all that's needed.

Magic is great... but it's not "magic".  It's not mental powers or ESP or
anything other than people with a tremendously vested interest in fooling
other people.

Penn Jillette once said something to the effect that most magic works
because normal people will never believe that anybody is so obsessive or
dull as to waste their lives perfecting such silly tricks.  ;^)

Jim Davis


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:264840
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to