doesn't this fall under infrastructure? I.e, something taxes are *supposed* to do? I don't see why a bridge should have to be self-supporting. Sounds like a recipe for more interstate bridge collapses to me. On the other hand, this sounds like more of a regional issue to me, so it probably should have been paid for with state not federal funds. But that might have reduced the size of the rebate that got sent out. Ah, the dilemmas.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have lots of bridge here. It costs 4 or 5 dollars for each car to > cross them going into the city. It's free to cross going out of the > city. They aren't even close to be being self-supporting. > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yeah hell, if they raised the ferry fee by a buck or two - the ferry could >> fund a bridge, of course I see it would put ferry operators in a bind ... so >> that's a catch 22.... >> >> I'd rather take a ferry anyway. I'll always take the Cape May Ferry over >> driving through Washington, DC to get through the East Coast. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:268883 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
