> RoMunn wrote: > McCain's plan, on the other hand, is the progressive plan,
It's progressively stupid. Naw, j/k. Full disclaimer, I work in this industry. IMO, it boils down to 2 issues: cost & coverage. McCain tackles cost, Obama tackles coverage. So let's look impartially at the facts behind both plans on those 2 metrics: Cost to the taxpayer -------------------------------- McCain's plan: $1.3T over 10 years Obama's plan: $1.6T Coverage Growth -------------------------------- Obama's plan: ~18m next year, ~34m in 2018 McCain's plan: ~5m by 2013 So the conclusion is that I don't like either of them. Actually I like Bush's idea of health savings accounts, he just totally sucked at doing anything meaningful with that concept but, as usual, the market place is stepping in (just like with electric cars!). Further I would say talking about any of this policy stuff is completely useless; none of any of it will matter for 2 shits in 2 months no matter who wins. So why pretend like it does? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:273227 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
