> RoMunn wrote:
> So she can shoot him? Isn't that what government-speak for "remove" means?
>

He's a union employee so he can't be fired.

> She didn't benefit personally.

You disagree with the commission.  I think you don't have to get much
farther with the analysis than to see just how involved Mr. Palin was
in state business.

That alone is evidence enough that it was personal.

But please continue to defend the indefensible as it's creating a
great time capsule for future historians to understand how this and
why Palin could EVER become a VP candidate.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:273511
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to