> RoMunn wrote: > So she can shoot him? Isn't that what government-speak for "remove" means? >
He's a union employee so he can't be fired. > She didn't benefit personally. You disagree with the commission. I think you don't have to get much farther with the analysis than to see just how involved Mr. Palin was in state business. That alone is evidence enough that it was personal. But please continue to defend the indefensible as it's creating a great time capsule for future historians to understand how this and why Palin could EVER become a VP candidate. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:273511 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5