On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Jerry wrote: > There you go again with that fictitious "MSM".
There is no fictitious MSM. Why is it that only really honest liberals like Camille Paglia can admit that the entire mass media outside two publications and talk radio is in the liberal camp? Why is that? So there is your definition of MSM. > I never saw a mass market media source that suggested he was a plant. > Any sources for that sentence? Gruss. :-) > As to the substance, Joe is right. We should be able to ask our > elected officials and candidates for office direct questions, even if > those questions are not popular with those same officials. Those same MSM "journalists" have spent the last week on an attempted character assassination campaign against Joe. How is it that someone can't ask a hard question of Barack Obama without the entire media establishment attempting to destroy his life? Does that seem fair to you? Would you like to be subjected to that sort of treatment just for questioning "The One"? It's offensive to the free exchange of ideas, and the irony is that it is the media, our supposed defenders of truth, who are behind the attacks. > Which is > why the Bush administration's refusal to talk to people and the press, > and now the McCain campaign doing the same thing (vetting of all > audience members, loyalty oaths, "free speech zone") has always > bothered me. > You mean like Democrats refusing to even attend a debate sponsored by Fox? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:275437 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
