Exactly... Some super sucker minnow will be found that is endangered. Or some rare slime mold to prevent the installation of solar or wind (wind dries out those poor slime molds)... Invariably, the same "green" power sources will ultimately be at odds with the envionmental groups that are screaming for them.
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 6:46 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Obama says he will bankrupt the coal industry Isn't there a large environmental impact on traditional hydro electric dams? (Not trying to be snarky...just asking) I read something a few weeks ago that New Jersey is doing something with a wind farm off the coast (that intersts me as I am from NJ originally) On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >seriouslynuclear, solar, thermo, and wind is a great way to go... > >coal is a beautiful fuel. i enjoy it.. > >but it is pretty nasty stuff, even if it is distiled before > >combustion > takes > >place. > > One option no one has mentioned that is about the cleanest and is > definitely renewable, and almost infinite in supply is hydro electric power. > With a combination of low flow turbines and more traditional hydro > electric dams, a significant portion of the power needs could be met > within 15 to 2o years. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:278097 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
