The Bears could NEVER play the Packers in the Super Bowl...bad analogy. On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ChuckG wrote: > > so wait... you're saying that Obama's victory wasn't necessarily because > he > > is a master strategist... but because his opponent was weak? > > > > who among us could have possibly called that? :) > > > > Shep is doing poll analysis, but I'll use a football analogy. > > Let's say it's da Superbowl and Ditka ess tied in da fort qwhoata wit > daaa packerz. > > And let's say daaa packerz have been playing slow and steady for tree > qwhoataz. > > Ditka's offense keeps going 3 and out while da packerz are racking up > possession. > > Ditka's line ess tired and the left guard pulls a hammy. > > Da packerz strategy and tactics of a slow and steady game has worn > down da bears. > > TOUCHDOWN! Packerz win. > > That's a good strategy huh? > > So all Shep did was point out the period in the 4th quarter forward > progress broke from the pattern. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:278833 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
