I think that traditionally they call it a "landslide" if the winner
tops 350 or 370 electoral votes, can't remember which. Presuming that
Obama wins NC (which seems likely and some have called already) then
he'll be sitting at 374. Add to that Senate Dem wins in states
considered once unlikely (Oregon, Colorado, etc) and a good sized gain
in the House (ousting the very last Republicans in New England) and an
argument could be made that Obama had pretty long coattails.

I don't really care for the terminology in the area though. Does a
landslide give you more of a mandate than a decisive victory? Meh. The
mandate is to try and move the country forward, to fix the crap that
is broken. And no victory, no matter how big, gives you the right to
shit on the minority. So I think its largely academic.

Judah

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would agree with that.
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:17 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Decisive" is the word I would use.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I am not so sure that Obama's victory cold accurately be descibed as a
>> > 'landslide'

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:278906
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to