> Scott wrote: > I could certainly see the evolutionary benefit in ending procreation in > defective gene lines,
What about organisms who can be either gender or who bud? (not weegs, spontaneously grow another creature. I said not weegs) To claim that anything is biologically proper is to essentially reject evolution since biology seeks to find the best way to procreate. Not beyond evolution to allow gay folk to procreate 10,000 years from now. So seems dumb to grab an evolutionary point in time and call it "proper". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280752 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
