negative. If that were the case they would not still be trucking it across New Mexico and, as I understand it, Nevada. Google WIPP and aso Yucca mountain.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Robert Munn <cfmuns...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > And long term risk of a nuclear meltdown. > > > > New nuclear technology makes a meltdown physically impossible as I > understand it. Small spherical fuel pellets rather than large rods. > > > > Also, no emissions but what happens to the nuclear waste? > > Going to just ship that to some third world country somewhere? > > > > No, we're not going to dump it on the third world. We'll leave it to idiots > like Huge Chavez to screw up the third world all by themselves. > > Right now we keep it on site at each plant. If Obama would repeal Jimmy > Carter's idiotic ban of spent fuel re-processing, we could just re-process > the fuel down to almost nothing, gaining greater efficiencies along the > way. > The French do it, why can't we? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283367 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
